DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23815] - [beanutils] PropertyUtils.getNestedProperty() doesn't allow getXxxx on Map-Instances any longer

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23815] - [beanutils] PropertyUtils.getNestedProperty() doesn't allow getXxxx on Map-Instances any longer

Bugzilla from bugzilla@apache.org
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG?
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23815>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND?
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23815





------- Additional Comments From [hidden email]  2005-05-28 09:37 -------
We do get the odd question on the user list about Struts 1.0 - but the vast
majority are about 1.1 or 1.2. Whether theres a big corporate silent majority
still stuck on 1.0, though I have no idea.

I agree with you - I've never had the need for a Map that also has properties.
I also think the decision was taken in BeanUtils 1.6 that its going to work on
the principle that "if its a Map, its always treated as a Map" and there isn't
a good reason for catering for anything else. Plus as you point out,
the "beanification" of BeanUtils means that if for example a Struts user has to
have a different behaviour such as this, they can override it and plug in a
different BeanUtilsBean implementation.

--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]