Fwd: Re: [JCS] missing 2.2 release in jira?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Fwd: Re: [JCS] missing 2.2 release in jira?

Thomas Vandahl
Hi folks,

I found out again that replying to the list did reply to the sender
instead. Does that happen to anyone else or is it my Thunderbird setting?

Bye, Thomas

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: [JCS] missing 2.2 release in jira?
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2017 10:58:54 +0200
From: Thomas Vandahl <[hidden email]>
To: Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]>

On 08.09.17 16:41, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> So it would be a 3.0. Do we expect anything else in a potential 3.0?

I made an attempt to integrate the ConcurrentLinkedHashMap by Ben Manes.
See
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jcs/branches/jcs-core-with-clhm
This would be a candidate feature for 3.0.
However, several (apparently unrelated) tests started to fail. Moreover,
the performance tests showed little or no improvement. If you want to
give it another shot, feel free.

Bye, Thomas

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: [JCS] missing 2.2 release in jira?

Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi Thomas,

on mails: with gmail it looks ok but think it does some things under the
hood too.

on the perf: I see and agree, will try to get some time end of the month to
investigate it, thanks for the precision!


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
<https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>

2017-09-10 17:28 GMT+02:00 Thomas Vandahl <[hidden email]>:

> Hi folks,
>
> I found out again that replying to the list did reply to the sender
> instead. Does that happen to anyone else or is it my Thunderbird setting?
>
> Bye, Thomas
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Re: [JCS] missing 2.2 release in jira?
> Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2017 10:58:54 +0200
> From: Thomas Vandahl <[hidden email]>
> To: Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]>
>
> On 08.09.17 16:41, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> > So it would be a 3.0. Do we expect anything else in a potential 3.0?
>
> I made an attempt to integrate the ConcurrentLinkedHashMap by Ben Manes.
> See
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jcs/
> branches/jcs-core-with-clhm
> This would be a candidate feature for 3.0.
> However, several (apparently unrelated) tests started to fail. Moreover,
> the performance tests showed little or no improvement. If you want to
> give it another shot, feel free.
>
> Bye, Thomas
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Fwd: Re: [JCS] missing 2.2 release in jira?

Oliver Heger-3
In reply to this post by Thomas Vandahl


Am 10.09.2017 um 17:28 schrieb Thomas Vandahl:
> Hi folks,
>
> I found out again that replying to the list did reply to the sender
> instead. Does that happen to anyone else or is it my Thunderbird setting?

Me too! This seems to be a new feature of Thunderbird which came in on a
recent update. In addition to the "Reply" button I always used to press
there is a new "Reply to list" button. Obviously, one must use the
latter one. However, I keep using "Reply" and then wonder why my mail
does not show up on the list.

Oliver

>
> Bye, Thomas
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Re: [JCS] missing 2.2 release in jira?
> Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2017 10:58:54 +0200
> From: Thomas Vandahl <[hidden email]>
> To: Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]>
>
> On 08.09.17 16:41, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>> So it would be a 3.0. Do we expect anything else in a potential 3.0?
>
> I made an attempt to integrate the ConcurrentLinkedHashMap by Ben Manes.
> See
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jcs/branches/jcs-core-with-clhm
> This would be a candidate feature for 3.0.
> However, several (apparently unrelated) tests started to fail. Moreover,
> the performance tests showed little or no improvement. If you want to
> give it another shot, feel free.
>
> Bye, Thomas
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Fwd: Re: [JCS] missing 2.2 release in jira?

Romain Manni-Bucau
back on the release topic (sorry for the delay, have been very busy
lately): does it sound ok for everyone  if I backport the jcache changes in
2.2 and release it from here (Some pointer on which branch I can reuse or
if I should create one from the 2.2 tag would be welcomed)?

as a side note for anyone with some time we should probably upgrade master
to 3.0-SNAPSHOT from what I understood, no?


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
<https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>

2017-09-10 20:57 GMT+02:00 Oliver Heger <[hidden email]>:

>
>
> Am 10.09.2017 um 17:28 schrieb Thomas Vandahl:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I found out again that replying to the list did reply to the sender
> > instead. Does that happen to anyone else or is it my Thunderbird setting?
>
> Me too! This seems to be a new feature of Thunderbird which came in on a
> recent update. In addition to the "Reply" button I always used to press
> there is a new "Reply to list" button. Obviously, one must use the
> latter one. However, I keep using "Reply" and then wonder why my mail
> does not show up on the list.
>
> Oliver
>
> >
> > Bye, Thomas
> >
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > Subject: Re: [JCS] missing 2.2 release in jira?
> > Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2017 10:58:54 +0200
> > From: Thomas Vandahl <[hidden email]>
> > To: Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]>
> >
> > On 08.09.17 16:41, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> >> So it would be a 3.0. Do we expect anything else in a potential 3.0?
> >
> > I made an attempt to integrate the ConcurrentLinkedHashMap by Ben Manes.
> > See
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jcs/
> branches/jcs-core-with-clhm
> > This would be a candidate feature for 3.0.
> > However, several (apparently unrelated) tests started to fail. Moreover,
> > the performance tests showed little or no improvement. If you want to
> > give it another shot, feel free.
> >
> > Bye, Thomas
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Fwd: Re: [JCS] missing 2.2 release in jira?

Thomas Vandahl
On 20.09.17 22:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> back on the release topic (sorry for the delay, have been very busy
> lately): does it sound ok for everyone  if I backport the jcache changes in
> 2.2 and release it from here (Some pointer on which branch I can reuse or
> if I should create one from the 2.2 tag would be welcomed)?

Branching from the 2.2 tag would be the cleanest way to go as the
branches that exist already are named after the target version.

> as a side note for anyone with some time we should probably upgrade master
> to 3.0-SNAPSHOT from what I understood, no?

I'll try to get to it this weekend.

Bye, Thomas

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]