[GitHub] stain commented on issue #53: COMMONSRDF-80: Bumping Jena version 3.5.0 => 3.9.0

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[GitHub] stain commented on issue #53: COMMONSRDF-80: Bumping Jena version 3.5.0 => 3.9.0

GitBox
stain commented on issue #53: COMMONSRDF-80: Bumping Jena version 3.5.0 => 3.9.0
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/53#issuecomment-451450510
 
 
   It is not as ideal, as it would make `commons-rdf-jena` as a Maven package no longer be a sufficient OSGi dependency by itself, as `jena-arq` is not an OSGi package (for some reason).
   
   But I understand it would make it easier for anyone using the regular `jena-arq`  dependencies together with Commons RDF to avoid duplication (particularly if you get different versions of Jena).
   
   I think for the OSGi dependencies to be calculated correct for `commons-rdf-jena` we need to then still list `jena-osgi` as an `<optional>` dependency.
   
   While the ideal solution would be for `jena-arq` etc. to be OSGi packages themselves (avoiding need for `jena-osgi` overall) I'm OK with the above solution for `commons-rdf-jena`. OSGi users would simply need to ignore `jena-arq` and add `jena-osgi`, we can document that.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[hidden email]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]