[GitHub] vanzin commented on a change in pull request #92: OpenSSL 1.1.0 updates with backward compatibility for OpenSSL 1.0.2 and 1.0.1

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[GitHub] vanzin commented on a change in pull request #92: OpenSSL 1.1.0 updates with backward compatibility for OpenSSL 1.0.2 and 1.0.1

GitBox
vanzin commented on a change in pull request #92: OpenSSL 1.1.0 updates with backward compatibility for OpenSSL 1.0.2 and 1.0.1
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-crypto/pull/92#discussion_r244812371
 
 

 ##########
 File path: src/main/java/org/apache/commons/crypto/jna/OpenSsl102NativeJna.java
 ##########
 @@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.commons.crypto.jna;
+
+import java.nio.ByteBuffer;
+
+import com.sun.jna.Native;
+import com.sun.jna.NativeLong;
+import com.sun.jna.ptr.PointerByReference;
+
+/**
+ * @author alex
+ *
+ */
+public class OpenSsl102NativeJna {
 
 Review comment:
   This class (and the 1.1 version) shouldn't be public.
   
   There also seems to be a lot of duplication between these classes. My gut tells me there should be an abstract base class with the common stuff and small specializations for each version. But this should be fine for now since it's not that much code anyway, and to be fair I'm not familiar with JNA and whether that would be ok.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[hidden email]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]