Re: svn commit: r939297 - /commons/sandbox/commons-math_l10n/trunk/

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: svn commit: r939297 - /commons/sandbox/commons-math_l10n/trunk/

sebb-2-2
On 29/04/2010, [hidden email] <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Author: erans
>  Date: Thu Apr 29 12:12:17 2010
>  New Revision: 939297
>
>  URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=939297&view=rev
>  Log:
>  Copy of current revision.

I thought the idea was to create a sandbox of just the cal10n sample,
at least initially.

That will make it much easier to see what is going on.

Having the whole of Math is unnecessary intially, and perhaps ever.

>
>  Added:
>     commons/sandbox/commons-math_l10n/trunk/
>       - copied from r939296, commons/proper/math/trunk/
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: svn commit: r939297 - /commons/sandbox/commons-math_l10n/trunk/

Gilles Sadowski
> I thought the idea was to create a sandbox of just the cal10n sample,
> at least initially.
>
> That will make it much easier to see what is going on.
>
> Having the whole of Math is unnecessary intially, and perhaps ever.

I don't understand.  What more will you have with a copy there of only the
files that are already available on JIRA?
I thought I should start making the modifications, so that there would a
working version of CM using the "CAL10N" library.


Gilles

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: svn commit: r939297 - /commons/sandbox/commons-math_l10n/trunk/

sebb-2-2
On 29/04/2010, Gilles Sadowski <[hidden email]> wrote:

> > I thought the idea was to create a sandbox of just the cal10n sample,
>  > at least initially.
>  >
>  > That will make it much easier to see what is going on.
>  >
>  > Having the whole of Math is unnecessary intially, and perhaps ever.
>
>
> I don't understand.  What more will you have with a copy there of only the
>  files that are already available on JIRA?

Being able to build it with IDEs and run tests using IDEs or Maven.
Easier to collaborate on changes.

>  I thought I should start making the modifications, so that there would a
>  working version of CM using the "CAL10N" library.

The problem with a full branch is that merging changes back can be
very tedious and easy to make errors.

It would be a lot easier to make the changes directly in trunk, once
the principle has been agreed on.

>
>  Gilles
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: svn commit: r939297 - /commons/sandbox/commons-math_l10n/trunk/

Luc Maisonobe

----- "sebb" <[hidden email]> a écrit :

> On 29/04/2010, Gilles Sadowski <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > I thought the idea was to create a sandbox of just the cal10n
> sample,
> >  > at least initially.
> >  >
> >  > That will make it much easier to see what is going on.
> >  >
> >  > Having the whole of Math is unnecessary intially, and perhaps
> ever.
> >
> >
> > I don't understand.  What more will you have with a copy there of
> only the
> >  files that are already available on JIRA?
>
> Being able to build it with IDEs and run tests using IDEs or Maven.
> Easier to collaborate on changes.

I second that.

Luc

>
> >  I thought I should start making the modifications, so that there
> would a
> >  working version of CM using the "CAL10N" library.
>
> The problem with a full branch is that merging changes back can be
> very tedious and easy to make errors.
>
> It would be a lot easier to make the changes directly in trunk, once
> the principle has been agreed on.
>
> >
> >  Gilles
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >  For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: svn commit: r939297 - /commons/sandbox/commons-math_l10n/trunk/

Gilles Sadowski
In reply to this post by sebb-2-2
> > I don't understand.  What more will you have with a copy there of only the
> >  files that are already available on JIRA?
>
> Being able to build it with IDEs and run tests using IDEs or Maven.
> Easier to collaborate on changes.

But you'll be able to do that with the whole thing too.
The alternative means that I have to select by hand which files to copy and
check that the selection is self-consistent. Whereas I thought to start from
a clean slate and make the minimum changes to show how it would work.
I stress again that, doing this, I intended to assume that a dependency to
"CAL10N" is acceptable. Do we have to vote first?

> >  I thought I should start making the modifications, so that there would a
> >  working version of CM using the "CAL10N" library.
>
> The problem with a full branch is that merging changes back can be
> very tedious and easy to make errors.
>
> It would be a lot easier to make the changes directly in trunk, once
> the principle has been agreed on.

I certainly agree.


Gilles

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: svn commit: r939297 - /commons/sandbox/commons-math_l10n/trunk/

sebb-2-2
On 29/04/2010, Gilles Sadowski <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > I don't understand.  What more will you have with a copy there of only the
>  > >  files that are already available on JIRA?
>  >
>  > Being able to build it with IDEs and run tests using IDEs or Maven.
>  > Easier to collaborate on changes.
>
>
> But you'll be able to do that with the whole thing too.

But it's harder to see the detail if there are lots of classes present.

>  The alternative means that I have to select by hand which files to copy and
>  check that the selection is self-consistent.

I think you only need to copy one or two classes to show the principle.

Try it and see.

>  Whereas I thought to start from
>  a clean slate and make the minimum changes to show how it would work.
>  I stress again that, doing this, I intended to assume that a dependency to
>  "CAL10N" is acceptable. Do we have to vote first?
>
>  > >  I thought I should start making the modifications, so that there would a
>  > >  working version of CM using the "CAL10N" library.
>  >
>  > The problem with a full branch is that merging changes back can be
>  > very tedious and easy to make errors.
>  >
>  > It would be a lot easier to make the changes directly in trunk, once
>  > the principle has been agreed on.
>
>
> I certainly agree.
>
>
>
>  Gilles
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]