[VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
23 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

Oliver Heger-3
Hi all,

after the failed votes for RC1 and RC2 a new RC has been created. There
has been further tweaking of the checkstyle configuration to solve build
problems on Java 1.6.

Configuration 2.1 RC3 is available for review here:
    https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration
(revision 14770)

Maven artifacts are here:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1197/

Details of changes since 2.0 are in the release notes:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration/RELEASE-NOTES.txt

https://home.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-2.1-rc3/changes-report.html

Here is the tag:

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_2_1_RC3
(revision 1755836)

Site:
   https://home.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-2.1-rc3/
(note some links in the menu are not yet working)

KEYS:
  http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS

Please review the release candidate and vote.
This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now, i.e. after 2000
GMT 14-Aug-2016

  [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
  [ ] +0 OK, but...
  [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
  [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...

Thanks!
Oliver



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

garydgregory
-1

From src zip: ASC, MD5, SHA1 OK.

Building with:

Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da; 2013-02-19
05:51:28-0800)
Maven home: E:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.5
Java version: *1.6.0_45*, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
Java home: E:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_45\jre
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
OS name: "windows 7", version: "6.1", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"

Gives me:

[INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.15:check (default) @
commons-configuration2 ---
[INFO]
[INFO] <<< cobertura-maven-plugin:2.7:cobertura-integration-test @
commons-configuration2 <<<
[INFO] artifact org.apache.commons:commons-configuration2: checking for
updates from central
[INFO] Fork Value is true
     [java] java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError:
edu/umd/cs/findbugs/FindBugs2 : Unsupported major.minor version 51.0
     [java]     at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
     [java]     at
java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClassCond(ClassLoader.java:631)
     [java]     at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:615)
     [java]     at
java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:141)
     [java]     at
java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:283)
     [java]     at
java.net.URLClassLoader.access$000(URLClassLoader.java:58)
     [java]     at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:197)
     [java]     at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native
Method)
     [java]     at
java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190)
     [java]     at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:306)
     [java]     at
sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301)
     [java]     at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:247)
     [java] Could not find the main class: edu.umd.cs.findbugs.FindBugs2.
Program will exit.
     [java] Exception in thread "main"
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 2:18.007s
[INFO] Finished at: Thu Aug 11 16:09:43 PDT 2016
[INFO] Final Memory: 54M/259M
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.4:site (default-site) on
project commons-configuration2: Execution default-site of goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.4:site failed: Java returned:
1 -> [Help
1]
[ERROR]
[ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e
switch.
[ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
[ERROR]
[ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
please read the following articles:
[ERROR] [Help 1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/PluginExecutionException


:-(

Gary


On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Oliver Heger <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> after the failed votes for RC1 and RC2 a new RC has been created. There
> has been further tweaking of the checkstyle configuration to solve build
> problems on Java 1.6.
>
> Configuration 2.1 RC3 is available for review here:
>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration
> (revision 14770)
>
> Maven artifacts are here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1197/
>
> Details of changes since 2.0 are in the release notes:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/
> configuration/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>
> https://home.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-2.1-rc3/changes-report.html
>
> Here is the tag:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/
> CONFIGURATION_2_1_RC3
> (revision 1755836)
>
> Site:
>    https://home.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-2.1-rc3/
> (note some links in the menu are not yet working)
>
> KEYS:
>   http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
>
> Please review the release candidate and vote.
> This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now, i.e. after 2000
> GMT 14-Aug-2016
>
>   [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>   [ ] +0 OK, but...
>   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>   [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
> Thanks!
> Oliver
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>


--
E-Mail: [hidden email] | [hidden email]
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

garydgregory
The error was building with 'mvn clean site'.

Gary

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Gary Gregory <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> -1
>
> From src zip: ASC, MD5, SHA1 OK.
>
> Building with:
>
> Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da; 2013-02-19
> 05:51:28-0800)
> Maven home: E:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.5
> Java version: *1.6.0_45*, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
> Java home: E:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_45\jre
> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
> OS name: "windows 7", version: "6.1", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
>
> Gives me:
>
> [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.15:check (default) @
> commons-configuration2 ---
> [INFO]
> [INFO] <<< cobertura-maven-plugin:2.7:cobertura-integration-test @
> commons-configuration2 <<<
> [INFO] artifact org.apache.commons:commons-configuration2: checking for
> updates from central
> [INFO] Fork Value is true
>      [java] java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError:
> edu/umd/cs/findbugs/FindBugs2 : Unsupported major.minor version 51.0
>      [java]     at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
>      [java]     at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClassCond(ClassLoader.
> java:631)
>      [java]     at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:615)
>      [java]     at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(
> SecureClassLoader.java:141)
>      [java]     at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.
> java:283)
>      [java]     at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$000(URLClassLoader.
> java:58)
>      [java]     at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:197)
>      [java]     at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native
> Method)
>      [java]     at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:
> 190)
>      [java]     at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:306)
>      [java]     at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(
> Launcher.java:301)
>      [java]     at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:247)
>      [java] Could not find the main class: edu.umd.cs.findbugs.FindBugs2.
> Program will exit.
>      [java] Exception in thread "main"
> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------
> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------
> [INFO] Total time: 2:18.007s
> [INFO] Finished at: Thu Aug 11 16:09:43 PDT 2016
> [INFO] Final Memory: 54M/259M
> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.4:site
> (default-site) on project commons-configuration2: Execution default-site of
> goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.4:site failed: Java
> returned: 1 -> [Help
> 1]
> [ERROR]
> [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the
> -e switch.
> [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
> [ERROR]
> [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
> please read the following articles:
> [ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/
> PluginExecutionException
>
>
> :-(
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Oliver Heger <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> after the failed votes for RC1 and RC2 a new RC has been created. There
>> has been further tweaking of the checkstyle configuration to solve build
>> problems on Java 1.6.
>>
>> Configuration 2.1 RC3 is available for review here:
>>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration
>> (revision 14770)
>>
>> Maven artifacts are here:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1197/
>>
>> Details of changes since 2.0 are in the release notes:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration
>> /RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>>
>> https://home.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-2.1-rc3/changes-report.html
>>
>> Here is the tag:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration
>> /tags/CONFIGURATION_2_1_RC3
>> (revision 1755836)
>>
>> Site:
>>    https://home.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-2.1-rc3/
>> (note some links in the menu are not yet working)
>>
>> KEYS:
>>   http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
>>
>> Please review the release candidate and vote.
>> This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now, i.e. after 2000
>> GMT 14-Aug-2016
>>
>>   [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>>   [ ] +0 OK, but...
>>   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>>   [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Oliver
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: [hidden email] | [hidden email]
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>



--
E-Mail: [hidden email] | [hidden email]
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

Oliver Heger-3


Am 12.08.2016 um 01:19 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> The error was building with 'mvn clean site'.

Can you build the site successfully with a JDK >= 7?

Oliver

>
> Gary
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Gary Gregory <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> -1
>>
>> From src zip: ASC, MD5, SHA1 OK.
>>
>> Building with:
>>
>> Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da; 2013-02-19
>> 05:51:28-0800)
>> Maven home: E:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.5
>> Java version: *1.6.0_45*, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
>> Java home: E:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_45\jre
>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
>> OS name: "windows 7", version: "6.1", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
>>
>> Gives me:
>>
>> [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.15:check (default) @
>> commons-configuration2 ---
>> [INFO]
>> [INFO] <<< cobertura-maven-plugin:2.7:cobertura-integration-test @
>> commons-configuration2 <<<
>> [INFO] artifact org.apache.commons:commons-configuration2: checking for
>> updates from central
>> [INFO] Fork Value is true
>>      [java] java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError:
>> edu/umd/cs/findbugs/FindBugs2 : Unsupported major.minor version 51.0
>>      [java]     at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
>>      [java]     at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClassCond(ClassLoader.
>> java:631)
>>      [java]     at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:615)
>>      [java]     at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(
>> SecureClassLoader.java:141)
>>      [java]     at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.
>> java:283)
>>      [java]     at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$000(URLClassLoader.
>> java:58)
>>      [java]     at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:197)
>>      [java]     at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native
>> Method)
>>      [java]     at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:
>> 190)
>>      [java]     at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:306)
>>      [java]     at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(
>> Launcher.java:301)
>>      [java]     at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:247)
>>      [java] Could not find the main class: edu.umd.cs.findbugs.FindBugs2.
>> Program will exit.
>>      [java] Exception in thread "main"
>> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------
>> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
>> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------
>> [INFO] Total time: 2:18.007s
>> [INFO] Finished at: Thu Aug 11 16:09:43 PDT 2016
>> [INFO] Final Memory: 54M/259M
>> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------
>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.4:site
>> (default-site) on project commons-configuration2: Execution default-site of
>> goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.4:site failed: Java
>> returned: 1 -> [Help
>> 1]
>> [ERROR]
>> [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the
>> -e switch.
>> [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
>> [ERROR]
>> [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
>> please read the following articles:
>> [ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/
>> PluginExecutionException
>>
>>
>> :-(
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Oliver Heger <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> after the failed votes for RC1 and RC2 a new RC has been created. There
>>> has been further tweaking of the checkstyle configuration to solve build
>>> problems on Java 1.6.
>>>
>>> Configuration 2.1 RC3 is available for review here:
>>>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration
>>> (revision 14770)
>>>
>>> Maven artifacts are here:
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1197/
>>>
>>> Details of changes since 2.0 are in the release notes:
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration
>>> /RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>>>
>>> https://home.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-2.1-rc3/changes-report.html
>>>
>>> Here is the tag:
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration
>>> /tags/CONFIGURATION_2_1_RC3
>>> (revision 1755836)
>>>
>>> Site:
>>>    https://home.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-2.1-rc3/
>>> (note some links in the menu are not yet working)
>>>
>>> KEYS:
>>>   http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
>>>
>>> Please review the release candidate and vote.
>>> This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now, i.e. after 2000
>>> GMT 14-Aug-2016
>>>
>>>   [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>>>   [ ] +0 OK, but...
>>>   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>>>   [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Oliver
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> E-Mail: [hidden email] | [hidden email]
>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

Dennis Kieselhorst
In reply to this post by garydgregory
Am 12.08.2016 um 01:18 schrieb Gary Gregory:

> -1
>
> From src zip: ASC, MD5, SHA1 OK.
>
> Building with:
>
> Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da; 2013-02-19
> 05:51:28-0800)
> Maven home: E:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.5
> Java version: *1.6.0_45*, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
> Java home: E:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_45\jre
> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
> OS name: "windows 7", version: "6.1", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
>
Is it really necessary that the site build is possible with JDK 1.6? I
checked the history and Oliver updated the findbugs-plugin with comment
"The site build now works with Java 1.8.". Site build with JDK 1.8 works
fine for me. I assume problems problems, if we downgrade it again and
would prefer that it works with latest JDK version.

Regards
Dennis

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

garydgregory
In reply to this post by Oliver Heger-3
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Oliver Heger <[hidden email]>
wrote:

>
>
> Am 12.08.2016 um 01:19 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> > The error was building with 'mvn clean site'.
>
> Can you build the site successfully with a JDK >= 7?
>

Yes, the same command works, no surprise there.

Gary

>
> Oliver
>
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Gary Gregory <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> -1
> >>
> >> From src zip: ASC, MD5, SHA1 OK.
> >>
> >> Building with:
> >>
> >> Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da;
> 2013-02-19
> >> 05:51:28-0800)
> >> Maven home: E:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.5
> >> Java version: *1.6.0_45*, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
> >> Java home: E:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_45\jre
> >> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
> >> OS name: "windows 7", version: "6.1", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
> >>
> >> Gives me:
> >>
> >> [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.15:check (default) @
> >> commons-configuration2 ---
> >> [INFO]
> >> [INFO] <<< cobertura-maven-plugin:2.7:cobertura-integration-test @
> >> commons-configuration2 <<<
> >> [INFO] artifact org.apache.commons:commons-configuration2: checking for
> >> updates from central
> >> [INFO] Fork Value is true
> >>      [java] java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError:
> >> edu/umd/cs/findbugs/FindBugs2 : Unsupported major.minor version 51.0
> >>      [java]     at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
> >>      [java]     at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClassCond(ClassLoader.
> >> java:631)
> >>      [java]     at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:
> 615)
> >>      [java]     at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(
> >> SecureClassLoader.java:141)
> >>      [java]     at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.
> >> java:283)
> >>      [java]     at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$000(URLClassLoader.
> >> java:58)
> >>      [java]     at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(
> URLClassLoader.java:197)
> >>      [java]     at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native
> >> Method)
> >>      [java]     at java.net.URLClassLoader.
> findClass(URLClassLoader.java:
> >> 190)
> >>      [java]     at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:
> 306)
> >>      [java]     at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(
> >> Launcher.java:301)
> >>      [java]     at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:
> 247)
> >>      [java] Could not find the main class:
> edu.umd.cs.findbugs.FindBugs2.
> >> Program will exit.
> >>      [java] Exception in thread "main"
> >> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ------------
> >> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> >> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ------------
> >> [INFO] Total time: 2:18.007s
> >> [INFO] Finished at: Thu Aug 11 16:09:43 PDT 2016
> >> [INFO] Final Memory: 54M/259M
> >> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ------------
> >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:
> maven-site-plugin:3.4:site
> >> (default-site) on project commons-configuration2: Execution
> default-site of
> >> goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.4:site failed: Java
> >> returned: 1 -> [Help
> >> 1]
> >> [ERROR]
> >> [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the
> >> -e switch.
> >> [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
> >> [ERROR]
> >> [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
> >> please read the following articles:
> >> [ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/
> >> PluginExecutionException
> >>
> >>
> >> :-(
> >>
> >> Gary
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Oliver Heger <
> >> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> after the failed votes for RC1 and RC2 a new RC has been created. There
> >>> has been further tweaking of the checkstyle configuration to solve
> build
> >>> problems on Java 1.6.
> >>>
> >>> Configuration 2.1 RC3 is available for review here:
> >>>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration
> >>> (revision 14770)
> >>>
> >>> Maven artifacts are here:
> >>>
> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapachecommons-1197/
> >>>
> >>> Details of changes since 2.0 are in the release notes:
> >>>
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration
> >>> /RELEASE-NOTES.txt
> >>>
> >>> https://home.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-2.1-rc3/
> changes-report.html
> >>>
> >>> Here is the tag:
> >>>
> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration
> >>> /tags/CONFIGURATION_2_1_RC3
> >>> (revision 1755836)
> >>>
> >>> Site:
> >>>    https://home.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-2.1-rc3/
> >>> (note some links in the menu are not yet working)
> >>>
> >>> KEYS:
> >>>   http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
> >>>
> >>> Please review the release candidate and vote.
> >>> This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now, i.e. after 2000
> >>> GMT 14-Aug-2016
> >>>
> >>>   [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> >>>   [ ] +0 OK, but...
> >>>   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> >>>   [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>> Oliver
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> E-Mail: [hidden email] | [hidden email]
> >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> >> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> >> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> >> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>


--
E-Mail: [hidden email] | [hidden email]
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

garydgregory
In reply to this post by Dennis Kieselhorst
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Dennis Kieselhorst <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Am 12.08.2016 um 01:18 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> > -1
> >
> > From src zip: ASC, MD5, SHA1 OK.
> >
> > Building with:
> >
> > Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da;
> 2013-02-19
> > 05:51:28-0800)
> > Maven home: E:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.5
> > Java version: *1.6.0_45*, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
> > Java home: E:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_45\jre
> > Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
> > OS name: "windows 7", version: "6.1", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
> >
> Is it really necessary that the site build is possible with JDK 1.6?


For me, keeping it simple is nice. If we say we have different requirements
for building jars vs. building the site, we are making our lives more
difficult IMO.

Gary


> I
> checked the history and Oliver updated the findbugs-plugin with comment
> "The site build now works with Java 1.8.". Site build with JDK 1.8 works
> fine for me. I assume problems problems, if we downgrade it again and
> would prefer that it works with latest JDK version.
>
> Regards
> Dennis
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>


--
E-Mail: [hidden email] | [hidden email]
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

Oliver Heger-3


Am 12.08.2016 um 20:11 schrieb Gary Gregory:

> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Dennis Kieselhorst <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> Am 12.08.2016 um 01:18 schrieb Gary Gregory:
>>> -1
>>>
>>> From src zip: ASC, MD5, SHA1 OK.
>>>
>>> Building with:
>>>
>>> Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da;
>> 2013-02-19
>>> 05:51:28-0800)
>>> Maven home: E:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.5
>>> Java version: *1.6.0_45*, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
>>> Java home: E:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_45\jre
>>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
>>> OS name: "windows 7", version: "6.1", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
>>>
>> Is it really necessary that the site build is possible with JDK 1.6?
>
>
> For me, keeping it simple is nice. If we say we have different requirements
> for building jars vs. building the site, we are making our lives more
> difficult IMO.

Okay, I have no interest in fixing the site build on Java 1.6 because I
do not think it is worth the effort. I belief that not many users will
build the site, and even less will do this on a JDK 1.6. It may also
well be the case that it is not possible to come to a solution which
supports both Java 1.6 and 1.8.

So from my PoV we have the following options regarding this release:

a) Accept the RC as is and ignore this issue.

b) Add a note to the building documentation that the site build requires
a minimum JDK of 1.7. This is a change of the site and does not require
another RC.

c) Switch to JDK 1.7 for [configuration]. I do not think that this is a
good solution because then all Java 6 users are out of the game for no
good reason.

d) I step back as RM and make room for more capable people.

Please tell me your preference.

Oliver

>
> Gary
>
>
>> I
>> checked the history and Oliver updated the findbugs-plugin with comment
>> "The site build now works with Java 1.8.". Site build with JDK 1.8 works
>> fine for me. I assume problems problems, if we downgrade it again and
>> would prefer that it works with latest JDK version.
>>
>> Regards
>> Dennis
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>
>>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

Charles Honton
Either ’a’ or ‘b’.

I’m all for anything that makes releasing easier.

+1 for requiring java 1.7 or 1.8 to build site
+1 (in general) for requiring java 1.7 or 1.8 to build artifacts, even if project is targeted to 1.6, 1.5, etc.

chas

> On Aug 13, 2016, at 12:37 PM, Oliver Heger <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 12.08.2016 um 20:11 schrieb Gary Gregory:
>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Dennis Kieselhorst <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Am 12.08.2016 um 01:18 schrieb Gary Gregory:
>>>> -1
>>>>
>>>> From src zip: ASC, MD5, SHA1 OK.
>>>>
>>>> Building with:
>>>>
>>>> Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da;
>>> 2013-02-19
>>>> 05:51:28-0800)
>>>> Maven home: E:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.5
>>>> Java version: *1.6.0_45*, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
>>>> Java home: E:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_45\jre
>>>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
>>>> OS name: "windows 7", version: "6.1", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
>>>>
>>> Is it really necessary that the site build is possible with JDK 1.6?
>>
>>
>> For me, keeping it simple is nice. If we say we have different requirements
>> for building jars vs. building the site, we are making our lives more
>> difficult IMO.
>
> Okay, I have no interest in fixing the site build on Java 1.6 because I
> do not think it is worth the effort. I belief that not many users will
> build the site, and even less will do this on a JDK 1.6. It may also
> well be the case that it is not possible to come to a solution which
> supports both Java 1.6 and 1.8.
>
> So from my PoV we have the following options regarding this release:
>
> a) Accept the RC as is and ignore this issue.
>
> b) Add a note to the building documentation that the site build requires
> a minimum JDK of 1.7. This is a change of the site and does not require
> another RC.
>
> c) Switch to JDK 1.7 for [configuration]. I do not think that this is a
> good solution because then all Java 6 users are out of the game for no
> good reason.
>
> d) I step back as RM and make room for more capable people.
>
> Please tell me your preference.
>
> Oliver
>
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>>> I
>>> checked the history and Oliver updated the findbugs-plugin with comment
>>> "The site build now works with Java 1.8.". Site build with JDK 1.8 works
>>> fine for me. I assume problems problems, if we downgrade it again and
>>> would prefer that it works with latest JDK version.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Dennis
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

garydgregory
In reply to this post by Oliver Heger-3
I would support another RC that clearly documents what the requirements are
for different parts of the build.

Then IMO we should switch trunk to Java 7.

Gary

On Aug 13, 2016 12:37 PM, "Oliver Heger" <[hidden email]>
wrote:

>
>
> Am 12.08.2016 um 20:11 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Dennis Kieselhorst <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Am 12.08.2016 um 01:18 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> >>> -1
> >>>
> >>> From src zip: ASC, MD5, SHA1 OK.
> >>>
> >>> Building with:
> >>>
> >>> Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da;
> >> 2013-02-19
> >>> 05:51:28-0800)
> >>> Maven home: E:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.5
> >>> Java version: *1.6.0_45*, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
> >>> Java home: E:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_45\jre
> >>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
> >>> OS name: "windows 7", version: "6.1", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
> >>>
> >> Is it really necessary that the site build is possible with JDK 1.6?
> >
> >
> > For me, keeping it simple is nice. If we say we have different
> requirements
> > for building jars vs. building the site, we are making our lives more
> > difficult IMO.
>
> Okay, I have no interest in fixing the site build on Java 1.6 because I
> do not think it is worth the effort. I belief that not many users will
> build the site, and even less will do this on a JDK 1.6. It may also
> well be the case that it is not possible to come to a solution which
> supports both Java 1.6 and 1.8.
>
> So from my PoV we have the following options regarding this release:
>
> a) Accept the RC as is and ignore this issue.
>
> b) Add a note to the building documentation that the site build requires
> a minimum JDK of 1.7. This is a change of the site and does not require
> another RC.
>
> c) Switch to JDK 1.7 for [configuration]. I do not think that this is a
> good solution because then all Java 6 users are out of the game for no
> good reason.
>
> d) I step back as RM and make room for more capable people.
>
> Please tell me your preference.
>
> Oliver
>
> >
> > Gary
> >
> >
> >> I
> >> checked the history and Oliver updated the findbugs-plugin with comment
> >> "The site build now works with Java 1.8.". Site build with JDK 1.8 works
> >> fine for me. I assume problems problems, if we downgrade it again and
> >> would prefer that it works with latest JDK version.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Dennis
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

Oliver Heger-3


Am 13.08.2016 um 22:29 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> I would support another RC that clearly documents what the requirements are
> for different parts of the build.

And what would make the big difference to adapted documentation on the side?

Gary, I fail to understand your motivation. In the past you stated
frequently that our release process is a PITA and you keep repeating the
RERO mantra. But now you make the release process even more of a PITA,
and you effectively block a release that has been asked for by users
multiple times.

I think your behavior causes harm to our users and this community as it
generates a lot of frustration. Please reconsider your -1 vote.

Oliver

>
> Then IMO we should switch trunk to Java 7.
>
> Gary
>
> On Aug 13, 2016 12:37 PM, "Oliver Heger" <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Am 12.08.2016 um 20:11 schrieb Gary Gregory:
>>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Dennis Kieselhorst <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Am 12.08.2016 um 01:18 schrieb Gary Gregory:
>>>>> -1
>>>>>
>>>>> From src zip: ASC, MD5, SHA1 OK.
>>>>>
>>>>> Building with:
>>>>>
>>>>> Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da;
>>>> 2013-02-19
>>>>> 05:51:28-0800)
>>>>> Maven home: E:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.5
>>>>> Java version: *1.6.0_45*, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
>>>>> Java home: E:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_45\jre
>>>>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
>>>>> OS name: "windows 7", version: "6.1", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
>>>>>
>>>> Is it really necessary that the site build is possible with JDK 1.6?
>>>
>>>
>>> For me, keeping it simple is nice. If we say we have different
>> requirements
>>> for building jars vs. building the site, we are making our lives more
>>> difficult IMO.
>>
>> Okay, I have no interest in fixing the site build on Java 1.6 because I
>> do not think it is worth the effort. I belief that not many users will
>> build the site, and even less will do this on a JDK 1.6. It may also
>> well be the case that it is not possible to come to a solution which
>> supports both Java 1.6 and 1.8.
>>
>> So from my PoV we have the following options regarding this release:
>>
>> a) Accept the RC as is and ignore this issue.
>>
>> b) Add a note to the building documentation that the site build requires
>> a minimum JDK of 1.7. This is a change of the site and does not require
>> another RC.
>>
>> c) Switch to JDK 1.7 for [configuration]. I do not think that this is a
>> good solution because then all Java 6 users are out of the game for no
>> good reason.
>>
>> d) I step back as RM and make room for more capable people.
>>
>> Please tell me your preference.
>>
>> Oliver
>>
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>
>>>> I
>>>> checked the history and Oliver updated the findbugs-plugin with comment
>>>> "The site build now works with Java 1.8.". Site build with JDK 1.8 works
>>>> fine for me. I assume problems problems, if we downgrade it again and
>>>> would prefer that it works with latest JDK version.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Dennis
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

garydgregory
A -1 does not block a release.

All I ask is for this oddity unique to this build to be documented properly
in the download. I am AFK so I am not sure if we even have a BUILDING.txt
in the root of the src zip, which where I look for this kind of
information. Or in the RELEASE-NOTES.txt.

The pain of releasing I have has nothing to do with this situation. It has
more to do with the double release of files to Nexus and our dist and the
many little steps we are forced to do.

Gary

On Aug 14, 2016 12:41 PM, "Oliver Heger" <[hidden email]>
wrote:

>
>
> Am 13.08.2016 um 22:29 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> > I would support another RC that clearly documents what the requirements
> are
> > for different parts of the build.
>
> And what would make the big difference to adapted documentation on the
> side?
>
> Gary, I fail to understand your motivation. In the past you stated
> frequently that our release process is a PITA and you keep repeating the
> RERO mantra. But now you make the release process even more of a PITA,
> and you effectively block a release that has been asked for by users
> multiple times.
>
> I think your behavior causes harm to our users and this community as it
> generates a lot of frustration. Please reconsider your -1 vote.
>
> Oliver
>
> >
> > Then IMO we should switch trunk to Java 7.
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > On Aug 13, 2016 12:37 PM, "Oliver Heger" <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 12.08.2016 um 20:11 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> >>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Dennis Kieselhorst <[hidden email]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Am 12.08.2016 um 01:18 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> >>>>> -1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> From src zip: ASC, MD5, SHA1 OK.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Building with:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da;
> >>>> 2013-02-19
> >>>>> 05:51:28-0800)
> >>>>> Maven home: E:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.5
> >>>>> Java version: *1.6.0_45*, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
> >>>>> Java home: E:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_45\jre
> >>>>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
> >>>>> OS name: "windows 7", version: "6.1", arch: "amd64", family:
> "windows"
> >>>>>
> >>>> Is it really necessary that the site build is possible with JDK 1.6?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> For me, keeping it simple is nice. If we say we have different
> >> requirements
> >>> for building jars vs. building the site, we are making our lives more
> >>> difficult IMO.
> >>
> >> Okay, I have no interest in fixing the site build on Java 1.6 because I
> >> do not think it is worth the effort. I belief that not many users will
> >> build the site, and even less will do this on a JDK 1.6. It may also
> >> well be the case that it is not possible to come to a solution which
> >> supports both Java 1.6 and 1.8.
> >>
> >> So from my PoV we have the following options regarding this release:
> >>
> >> a) Accept the RC as is and ignore this issue.
> >>
> >> b) Add a note to the building documentation that the site build requires
> >> a minimum JDK of 1.7. This is a change of the site and does not require
> >> another RC.
> >>
> >> c) Switch to JDK 1.7 for [configuration]. I do not think that this is a
> >> good solution because then all Java 6 users are out of the game for no
> >> good reason.
> >>
> >> d) I step back as RM and make room for more capable people.
> >>
> >> Please tell me your preference.
> >>
> >> Oliver
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Gary
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> I
> >>>> checked the history and Oliver updated the findbugs-plugin with
> comment
> >>>> "The site build now works with Java 1.8.". Site build with JDK 1.8
> works
> >>>> fine for me. I assume problems problems, if we downgrade it again and
> >>>> would prefer that it works with latest JDK version.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>> Dennis
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

Jörg Schaible
In reply to this post by Oliver Heger-3
Builds from src tarball with my compiler zoo:

+1

Oliver Heger wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> after the failed votes for RC1 and RC2 a new RC has been created. There
> has been further tweaking of the checkstyle configuration to solve build
> problems on Java 1.6.
>
> Configuration 2.1 RC3 is available for review here:
>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration
> (revision 14770)
>
> Maven artifacts are here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1197/
>
> Details of changes since 2.0 are in the release notes:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>
> https://home.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-2.1-rc3/changes-report.html
>
> Here is the tag:
>
>
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_2_1_RC3

> (revision 1755836)
>
> Site:
>    https://home.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-2.1-rc3/
> (note some links in the menu are not yet working)
>
> KEYS:
>   http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
>
> Please review the release candidate and vote.
> This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now, i.e. after 2000
> GMT 14-Aug-2016
>
>   [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>   [ ] +0 OK, but...
>   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>   [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
> Thanks!
> Oliver



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

Dennis Kieselhorst
In reply to this post by Oliver Heger-3
Am 13.08.2016 um 21:37 schrieb Oliver Heger:
> a) Accept the RC as is and ignore this issue.
>
> b) Add a note to the building documentation that the site build requires
> a minimum JDK of 1.7. This is a change of the site and does not require
> another RC.
+1 for a or b.

Regards
Dennis

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

garydgregory
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 12:01 AM, Dennis Kieselhorst <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Am 13.08.2016 um 21:37 schrieb Oliver Heger:
> > a) Accept the RC as is and ignore this issue.
> >
> > b) Add a note to the building documentation that the site build requires
> > a minimum JDK of 1.7. This is a change of the site and does not require
> > another RC.
>

The release notes currently states:

Commons Configuration 2.1 requires Java 1.6 or higher.

We should add:

Building the site requires Java 7.

I'm guessing someone will complain no matter what ;-)

Gary


> +1 for a or b.
>
> Regards
> Dennis
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>


--
E-Mail: [hidden email] | [hidden email]
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

Oliver Heger-3
In reply to this post by Oliver Heger-3
+1

Oliver

Am 11.08.2016 um 22:02 schrieb Oliver Heger:

> Hi all,
>
> after the failed votes for RC1 and RC2 a new RC has been created. There
> has been further tweaking of the checkstyle configuration to solve build
> problems on Java 1.6.
>
> Configuration 2.1 RC3 is available for review here:
>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration
> (revision 14770)
>
> Maven artifacts are here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1197/
>
> Details of changes since 2.0 are in the release notes:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>
> https://home.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-2.1-rc3/changes-report.html
>
> Here is the tag:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_2_1_RC3
> (revision 1755836)
>
> Site:
>    https://home.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-2.1-rc3/
> (note some links in the menu are not yet working)
>
> KEYS:
>   http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
>
> Please review the release candidate and vote.
> This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now, i.e. after 2000
> GMT 14-Aug-2016
>
>   [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>   [ ] +0 OK, but...
>   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>   [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
> Thanks!
> Oliver
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

Oliver Heger-3
In reply to this post by Oliver Heger-3
The vote to release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3 failed with the
following binding votes:

Gary Gregory: -1
Jörg Schaible: +1
Oliver Heger: +1

Oliver

Am 11.08.2016 um 22:02 schrieb Oliver Heger:

> Hi all,
>
> after the failed votes for RC1 and RC2 a new RC has been created. There
> has been further tweaking of the checkstyle configuration to solve build
> problems on Java 1.6.
>
> Configuration 2.1 RC3 is available for review here:
>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration
> (revision 14770)
>
> Maven artifacts are here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1197/
>
> Details of changes since 2.0 are in the release notes:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>
> https://home.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-2.1-rc3/changes-report.html
>
> Here is the tag:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_2_1_RC3
> (revision 1755836)
>
> Site:
>    https://home.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-2.1-rc3/
> (note some links in the menu are not yet working)
>
> KEYS:
>   http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
>
> Please review the release candidate and vote.
> This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now, i.e. after 2000
> GMT 14-Aug-2016
>
>   [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>   [ ] +0 OK, but...
>   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>   [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
> Thanks!
> Oliver
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

garydgregory
You can wait and ask for more reviews too...

Gary

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Oliver Heger <[hidden email]
> wrote:

> The vote to release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3 failed with the
> following binding votes:
>
> Gary Gregory:   -1
> Jörg Schaible:  +1
> Oliver Heger:   +1
>
> Oliver
>
> Am 11.08.2016 um 22:02 schrieb Oliver Heger:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > after the failed votes for RC1 and RC2 a new RC has been created. There
> > has been further tweaking of the checkstyle configuration to solve build
> > problems on Java 1.6.
> >
> > Configuration 2.1 RC3 is available for review here:
> >     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration
> > (revision 14770)
> >
> > Maven artifacts are here:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapachecommons-1197/
> >
> > Details of changes since 2.0 are in the release notes:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/
> configuration/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
> >
> > https://home.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-2.1-rc3/
> changes-report.html
> >
> > Here is the tag:
> >
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/
> CONFIGURATION_2_1_RC3
> > (revision 1755836)
> >
> > Site:
> >    https://home.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-2.1-rc3/
> > (note some links in the menu are not yet working)
> >
> > KEYS:
> >   http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
> >
> > Please review the release candidate and vote.
> > This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now, i.e. after 2000
> > GMT 14-Aug-2016
> >
> >   [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> >   [ ] +0 OK, but...
> >   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> >   [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Oliver
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>


--
E-Mail: [hidden email] | [hidden email]
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

Raviteja Lokineni
If it's a majority win vote and if my vote counts +1 from me too.

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Gary Gregory <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> You can wait and ask for more reviews too...
>
> Gary
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Oliver Heger <
> [hidden email]
> > wrote:
>
> > The vote to release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3 failed with the
> > following binding votes:
> >
> > Gary Gregory:   -1
> > Jörg Schaible:  +1
> > Oliver Heger:   +1
> >
> > Oliver
> >
> > Am 11.08.2016 um 22:02 schrieb Oliver Heger:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > after the failed votes for RC1 and RC2 a new RC has been created. There
> > > has been further tweaking of the checkstyle configuration to solve
> build
> > > problems on Java 1.6.
> > >
> > > Configuration 2.1 RC3 is available for review here:
> > >     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration
> > > (revision 14770)
> > >
> > > Maven artifacts are here:
> > >
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > orgapachecommons-1197/
> > >
> > > Details of changes since 2.0 are in the release notes:
> > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/
> > configuration/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
> > >
> > > https://home.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-2.1-rc3/
> > changes-report.html
> > >
> > > Here is the tag:
> > >
> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/
> > CONFIGURATION_2_1_RC3
> > > (revision 1755836)
> > >
> > > Site:
> > >    https://home.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-2.1-rc3/
> > > (note some links in the menu are not yet working)
> > >
> > > KEYS:
> > >   http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
> > >
> > > Please review the release candidate and vote.
> > > This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now, i.e. after 2000
> > > GMT 14-Aug-2016
> > >
> > >   [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> > >   [ ] +0 OK, but...
> > >   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> > >   [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Oliver
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: [hidden email] | [hidden email]
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>



--
*Raviteja Lokineni* | Business Intelligence Developer
TD Ameritrade

E: [hidden email]

[image: View Raviteja Lokineni's profile on LinkedIn]
<http://in.linkedin.com/in/ravitejalokineni>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

Benedikt Ritter-4
In reply to this post by Oliver Heger-3
Hello Oliver,

Sorry that it took me so long.

+1 for this release. The problems with Java 1.6 have been resolved. Good
work!

When building with Java 9 EA the build fails. I think we need to
investigate this for all our components soon.

Benedikt

Oliver Heger <[hidden email]> schrieb am Do., 11. Aug. 2016
um 22:02 Uhr:

> Hi all,
>
> after the failed votes for RC1 and RC2 a new RC has been created. There
> has been further tweaking of the checkstyle configuration to solve build
> problems on Java 1.6.
>
> Configuration 2.1 RC3 is available for review here:
>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration
> (revision 14770)
>
> Maven artifacts are here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1197/
>
> Details of changes since 2.0 are in the release notes:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>
> https://home.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-2.1-rc3/changes-report.html
>
> Here is the tag:
>
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_2_1_RC3
> (revision 1755836)
>
> Site:
>    https://home.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-2.1-rc3/
> (note some links in the menu are not yet working)
>
> KEYS:
>   http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
>
> Please review the release candidate and vote.
> This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now, i.e. after 2000
> GMT 14-Aug-2016
>
>   [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>   [ ] +0 OK, but...
>   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>   [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
> Thanks!
> Oliver
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>
12