[VOTE][modeler] Promote 2.0 RC1 to 2.0 Final (was Re: [modeler] 2.0 RC1 ready for review)

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
9 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[VOTE][modeler] Promote 2.0 RC1 to 2.0 Final (was Re: [modeler] 2.0 RC1 ready for review)

Davanum Srinivas
Thanks Rahul, will keep those in mind for the next time around.

Team,
Could i get some votes to promote the 2.0 RC1 to 2.0 Final?

Here's my +1 to get the ball rolling.

thanks,
dims

On 7/22/06, Rahul Akolkar <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On 7/21/06, Davanum Srinivas <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > One more rev folks..Changed the version to 2.0 because of the
> > incompatible api change. Also please note that the minimum jdk version
> > is 1.3.
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~dims/commons-modeler-2.0-RC1/
> >
> <snip/>
>
> Looks good:
>  * Sigs, md5s pan out
>  * Source distro jars,sites,dists
>  * jar/manifest looks ok
>
> Nits (not blockers, IMO):
>  * POM and jar md5s not in recommended format
>  * We should aim to have all component sites display docs for latest 3
> (?) releases
>
> -Rahul
>
>
> > thanks,
> > dims
> >
> <snap/>
>


--
Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE][modeler] Promote 2.0 RC1 to 2.0 Final (was Re: [modeler] 2.0 RC1 ready for review)

Henri Yandell
+1.

I'm not concerned with having old versions of the javadoc on the site
compared to getting a release out there. (Plus of course I believe in
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/multidoc-jnr/).

Hen

On 7/25/06, Davanum Srinivas <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Thanks Rahul, will keep those in mind for the next time around.
>
> Team,
> Could i get some votes to promote the 2.0 RC1 to 2.0 Final?
>
> Here's my +1 to get the ball rolling.
>
> thanks,
> dims

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE][modeler] Promote 2.0 RC1 to 2.0 Final (was Re: [modeler] 2.0 RC1 ready for review)

Bill Barker-2
In reply to this post by Davanum Srinivas
+1

"Davanum Srinivas" <[hidden email]> wrote in message
news:[hidden email]...

> Thanks Rahul, will keep those in mind for the next time around.
>
> Team,
> Could i get some votes to promote the 2.0 RC1 to 2.0 Final?
>
> Here's my +1 to get the ball rolling.
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On 7/22/06, Rahul Akolkar <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> On 7/21/06, Davanum Srinivas <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> > One more rev folks..Changed the version to 2.0 because of the
>> > incompatible api change. Also please note that the minimum jdk version
>> > is 1.3.
>> >
>> > http://people.apache.org/~dims/commons-modeler-2.0-RC1/
>> >
>> <snip/>
>>
>> Looks good:
>>  * Sigs, md5s pan out
>>  * Source distro jars,sites,dists
>>  * jar/manifest looks ok
>>
>> Nits (not blockers, IMO):
>>  * POM and jar md5s not in recommended format
>>  * We should aim to have all component sites display docs for latest 3
>> (?) releases
>>
>> -Rahul
>>
>>
>> > thanks,
>> > dims
>> >
>> <snap/>
>>
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE][modeler] Promote 2.0 RC1 to 2.0 Final (was Re: [modeler] 2.0 RC1 ready for review)

Rahul Akolkar
In reply to this post by Davanum Srinivas
On 7/25/06, Davanum Srinivas <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Thanks Rahul, will keep those in mind for the next time around.
>
> Team,
> Could i get some votes to promote the 2.0 RC1 to 2.0 Final?
>
<snip/>

+1

Sigs, sums look good.
Source rebuilds (m1).

IMO, two nits worth fixing before cutting the release:

 * Why build.properties.default and build.properties.sample? (the
former is still in CVS land, please update if its still needed)
 * Please keep build.xml version in sync with project.xml version
(currently, the former is at 1.2-dev)

For my own understanding -- are you cutting RCs using ant or maven
(for Java compilation)? If m1, how do you ensure JDK 1.3 compat? I
know there is a bootclasspath setting in the m2 compiler plugin, but I
haven't had the need to figure out the m1 bits yet. I tried to look at
the [modeler] POM for clues.

-Rahul


> Here's my +1 to get the ball rolling.
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On 7/22/06, Rahul Akolkar <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > On 7/21/06, Davanum Srinivas <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > One more rev folks..Changed the version to 2.0 because of the
> > > incompatible api change. Also please note that the minimum jdk version
> > > is 1.3.
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~dims/commons-modeler-2.0-RC1/
> > >
> > <snip/>
> >
> > Looks good:
> >  * Sigs, md5s pan out
> >  * Source distro jars,sites,dists
> >  * jar/manifest looks ok
> >
> > Nits (not blockers, IMO):
> >  * POM and jar md5s not in recommended format
> >  * We should aim to have all component sites display docs for latest 3
> > (?) releases
> >
> > -Rahul
> >
> >
> > > thanks,
> > > dims
> > >
> > <snap/>
> >
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE][modeler] Promote 2.0 RC1 to 2.0 Final (was Re: [modeler] 2.0 RC1 ready for review)

Davanum Srinivas
Rahul,

i am going to leave the build.xml.* around for this time...I use the
maven1 properties (maven.compile.source and maven.compile.target) to
set the jdk version to 1.3. I will fix the build.xml.

thanks,
dims

On 7/29/06, Rahul Akolkar <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On 7/25/06, Davanum Srinivas <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > Thanks Rahul, will keep those in mind for the next time around.
> >
> > Team,
> > Could i get some votes to promote the 2.0 RC1 to 2.0 Final?
> >
> <snip/>
>
> +1
>
> Sigs, sums look good.
> Source rebuilds (m1).
>
> IMO, two nits worth fixing before cutting the release:
>
>  * Why build.properties.default and build.properties.sample? (the
> former is still in CVS land, please update if its still needed)
>  * Please keep build.xml version in sync with project.xml version
> (currently, the former is at 1.2-dev)
>
> For my own understanding -- are you cutting RCs using ant or maven
> (for Java compilation)? If m1, how do you ensure JDK 1.3 compat? I
> know there is a bootclasspath setting in the m2 compiler plugin, but I
> haven't had the need to figure out the m1 bits yet. I tried to look at
> the [modeler] POM for clues.
>
> -Rahul
>
>
> > Here's my +1 to get the ball rolling.
> >
> > thanks,
> > dims
> >
> > On 7/22/06, Rahul Akolkar <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > On 7/21/06, Davanum Srinivas <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > One more rev folks..Changed the version to 2.0 because of the
> > > > incompatible api change. Also please note that the minimum jdk version
> > > > is 1.3.
> > > >
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~dims/commons-modeler-2.0-RC1/
> > > >
> > > <snip/>
> > >
> > > Looks good:
> > >  * Sigs, md5s pan out
> > >  * Source distro jars,sites,dists
> > >  * jar/manifest looks ok
> > >
> > > Nits (not blockers, IMO):
> > >  * POM and jar md5s not in recommended format
> > >  * We should aim to have all component sites display docs for latest 3
> > > (?) releases
> > >
> > > -Rahul
> > >
> > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > > dims
> > > >
> > > <snap/>
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>


--
Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE][modeler] Promote 2.0 RC1 to 2.0 Final (was Re: [modeler] 2.0 RC1 ready for review)

kevan
In reply to this post by Davanum Srinivas
My previous reply went direct to dims, instead of to this list.

Here's my +1.

--kevan

On Jul 25, 2006, at 9:40 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:

> Thanks Rahul, will keep those in mind for the next time around.
>
> Team,
> Could i get some votes to promote the 2.0 RC1 to 2.0 Final?
>
> Here's my +1 to get the ball rolling.
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On 7/22/06, Rahul Akolkar <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> On 7/21/06, Davanum Srinivas <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> > One more rev folks..Changed the version to 2.0 because of the
>> > incompatible api change. Also please note that the minimum jdk  
>> version
>> > is 1.3.
>> >
>> > http://people.apache.org/~dims/commons-modeler-2.0-RC1/
>> >
>> <snip/>
>>
>> Looks good:
>>  * Sigs, md5s pan out
>>  * Source distro jars,sites,dists
>>  * jar/manifest looks ok
>>
>> Nits (not blockers, IMO):
>>  * POM and jar md5s not in recommended format
>>  * We should aim to have all component sites display docs for  
>> latest 3
>> (?) releases
>>
>> -Rahul
>>
>>
>> > thanks,
>> > dims
>> >
>> <snap/>
>>
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service  
> Developers)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE][modeler] Promote 2.0 RC1 to 2.0 Final (was Re: [modeler] 2.0 RC1 ready for review)

Rahul Akolkar
In reply to this post by Davanum Srinivas
On 7/30/06, Davanum Srinivas <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Rahul,
>
> i am going to leave the build.xml.* around for this time...I use the
> maven1 properties (maven.compile.source and maven.compile.target) to
> set the jdk version to 1.3. I will fix the build.xml.
>
<snip/>

Depending upon the transitive closure of 1.3 methods in [modeler],
just that may or may not be sufficient. There have been some
discussions on this, but unfortunately I can't locate them in the
archives ATM (sorry!). Building the binaries with the minimum JDK that
the component supports is probably considered "safer" (and I'm not
sure how to do that with m1 -- which is why I asked).

-Rahul


> thanks,
> dims
>
> On 7/29/06, Rahul Akolkar <[hidden email]> wrote:
<snap/>
> >
> > For my own understanding -- are you cutting RCs using ant or maven
> > (for Java compilation)? If m1, how do you ensure JDK 1.3 compat? I
> > know there is a bootclasspath setting in the m2 compiler plugin, but I
> > haven't had the need to figure out the m1 bits yet. I tried to look at
> > the [modeler] POM for clues.
> >
> > -Rahul
> >
<snip/>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE][modeler] Promote 2.0 RC1 to 2.0 Final (was Re: [modeler] 2.0 RC1 ready for review)

Davanum Srinivas
Rahul,

Let's do this now. If we find a problem, i can spin a 2.1 real quick.

thanks,
dims

On 7/31/06, Rahul Akolkar <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On 7/30/06, Davanum Srinivas <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > Rahul,
> >
> > i am going to leave the build.xml.* around for this time...I use the
> > maven1 properties (maven.compile.source and maven.compile.target) to
> > set the jdk version to 1.3. I will fix the build.xml.
> >
> <snip/>
>
> Depending upon the transitive closure of 1.3 methods in [modeler],
> just that may or may not be sufficient. There have been some
> discussions on this, but unfortunately I can't locate them in the
> archives ATM (sorry!). Building the binaries with the minimum JDK that
> the component supports is probably considered "safer" (and I'm not
> sure how to do that with m1 -- which is why I asked).
>
> -Rahul
>
>
> > thanks,
> > dims
> >
> > On 7/29/06, Rahul Akolkar <[hidden email]> wrote:
> <snap/>
> > >
> > > For my own understanding -- are you cutting RCs using ant or maven
> > > (for Java compilation)? If m1, how do you ensure JDK 1.3 compat? I
> > > know there is a bootclasspath setting in the m2 compiler plugin, but I
> > > haven't had the need to figure out the m1 bits yet. I tried to look at
> > > the [modeler] POM for clues.
> > >
> > > -Rahul
> > >
> <snip/>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>


--
Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE][modeler] Promote 2.0 RC1 to 2.0 Final (was Re: [modeler] 2.0 RC1 ready for review)

Rahul Akolkar
On 7/31/06, Davanum Srinivas <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Rahul,
>
> Let's do this now. If we find a problem, i can spin a 2.1 real quick.
>
<snip/>

I'm fine with that (since you're doing all the work on the [modeler]
release -- thanks for that, BTW).

-Rahul


> thanks,
> dims
>
<snap/>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]