[jira] [Commented] (LANG-1478) ClassUtils getAbbreviatedName uses len one character shorter

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view

[jira] [Commented] (LANG-1478) ClassUtils getAbbreviatedName uses len one character shorter

ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16915106#comment-16915106 ]

Bruno P. Kinoshita commented on LANG-1478:

Oh, I see what you mean.
System.out.println(ClassUtils.getAbbreviatedName("ab.de.Ghij", className.length())); // 10
// prints a.de.Ghij {code}
So when you get the abbreviated name passing the exact length of the class name, it is indeed one character short. I agree it is annoying having to use `className.length() + 1`... but I suspect we could have some users using it.

I will approve the PR, but will ask in the mailing list before merging it first, to check whether we will need to wait for a major release - as this could break someone else's code.

> ClassUtils getAbbreviatedName uses len one character shorter
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LANG-1478
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1478
>             Project: Commons Lang
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Peter Verhas
>            Priority: Minor
>          Time Spent: 0.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
> The {{ClassUtils}} method {{getAbbreviatedName}} calculates the required lenght one character short. That way
> {code}
> final String ANY_CLASS_FULL_NAME = "....";
> assertEquals("ANY_CLASS_FULL_NAME ", ClassUtils.getAbbreviatedName(ANY_CLASS_FULL_NAME , ANY_CLASS_FULL_NAME .length()));
> {code}
> will abbreviate the class name, although we are asking exactly the same number of characters as they are there. The solution is that
> {code}
> if (availableSpace > 0) {
> {code}
> has to be modified to
> {code}
> if (availableSpace >= 0) {
> {code}
> since the value zero means that we exactly used up the available character width.
> This is just a quick fix for this issue, but generally, the algorithm is faulty. It runs many times out of the desired length. It actually uses the len parameter, not as the desired final length but rather a length for which what is out of the range on the left that has to be abbreviated. For that, the code could be much simpler. (See LANG-1480.)

This message was sent by Atlassian Jira