[lang][text] TEXT-101: RandomStringUtils

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
8 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[lang][text] TEXT-101: RandomStringUtils

garydgregory
Can someone summarize what our options are here please? I'd rather see it
fresh than chasing links in mailing list archives and try to un-nest all
the nesting... ;-)

Gary



On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Rob Tompkins <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> As I'm pulling this in this crosses my mind:
>
> Wait I'm curious here. Weren't folks leaning towards keeping
> RandomStringUtils in [lang]?
>
> The thread in question is this one: http://markmail.org/message/
> 5tblwhldrwsbfdym
>
> It feels like @britter <https://github.com/britter>, @PascalSchumacher
> <https://github.com/pascalschumacher>, and @garydgregory
> <https://github.com/garydgregory> were all leaning towards the [lang]
> option. If that's the case we should probably go with that.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/62#issuecomment-332622968>,
> or mute the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABIfN0WS8OJew2JaosTy8DEkFh8bqjU8ks5smpuVgaJpZM4PO83B>
> .
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [lang][text] TEXT-101: RandomStringUtils

Rob Tompkins
Options:

(a) leave RandomStringUtils deprecated in [lang] and pull in Amey’s pull request moving it into [text].
(b) undeprecate it in [lang].

The question is where should it reside? Does it fit as a general java Lang extension or is it more focused on text?

I’m in the middle here. Note also that we had some users ask why it had been deprecated with no alternative.

Amey - keep me honest here. I don’t want to overlook anything.

-Rob

> On Sep 28, 2017, at 5:13 PM, Gary Gregory <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Can someone summarize what our options are here please? I'd rather see it
> fresh than chasing links in mailing list archives and try to un-nest all
> the nesting... ;-)
>
> Gary
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Rob Tompkins <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> As I'm pulling this in this crosses my mind:
>>
>> Wait I'm curious here. Weren't folks leaning towards keeping
>> RandomStringUtils in [lang]?
>>
>> The thread in question is this one: http://markmail.org/message/
>> 5tblwhldrwsbfdym
>>
>> It feels like @britter <https://github.com/britter>, @PascalSchumacher
>> <https://github.com/pascalschumacher>, and @garydgregory
>> <https://github.com/garydgregory> were all leaning towards the [lang]
>> option. If that's the case we should probably go with that.
>>
>> —
>> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
>> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
>> <https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/62#issuecomment-332622968>,
>> or mute the thread
>> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABIfN0WS8OJew2JaosTy8DEkFh8bqjU8ks5smpuVgaJpZM4PO83B>
>> .
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [lang][text] TEXT-101: RandomStringUtils

Pascal Schumacher
After thinking more about it, I came the conclusion that
RandomStringUtils fits into [lang], so I'm for option (b).

Cheers,
Pascal

Am 28.09.2017 um 23:26 schrieb Rob Tompkins:

> Options:
>
> (a) leave RandomStringUtils deprecated in [lang] and pull in Amey’s pull request moving it into [text].
> (b) undeprecate it in [lang].
>
> The question is where should it reside? Does it fit as a general java Lang extension or is it more focused on text?
>
> I’m in the middle here. Note also that we had some users ask why it had been deprecated with no alternative.
>
> Amey - keep me honest here. I don’t want to overlook anything.
>
> -Rob
>
>> On Sep 28, 2017, at 5:13 PM, Gary Gregory <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Can someone summarize what our options are here please? I'd rather see it
>> fresh than chasing links in mailing list archives and try to un-nest all
>> the nesting... ;-)
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Rob Tompkins <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> As I'm pulling this in this crosses my mind:
>>>
>>> Wait I'm curious here. Weren't folks leaning towards keeping
>>> RandomStringUtils in [lang]?
>>>
>>> The thread in question is this one: http://markmail.org/message/
>>> 5tblwhldrwsbfdym
>>>
>>> It feels like @britter <https://github.com/britter>, @PascalSchumacher
>>> <https://github.com/pascalschumacher>, and @garydgregory
>>> <https://github.com/garydgregory> were all leaning towards the [lang]
>>> option. If that's the case we should probably go with that.
>>>
>>> —
>>> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
>>> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
>>> <https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/62#issuecomment-332622968>,
>>> or mute the thread
>>> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABIfN0WS8OJew2JaosTy8DEkFh8bqjU8ks5smpuVgaJpZM4PO83B>
>>> .
>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [lang][text] TEXT-101: RandomStringUtils

Gilles Sadowski
On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 10:11:07 +0200, Pascal Schumacher wrote:

> After thinking more about it, I came the conclusion that
> RandomStringUtils fits into [lang], so I'm for option (b).
>
> Cheers,
> Pascal
>
> Am 28.09.2017 um 23:26 schrieb Rob Tompkins:
>> Options:
>>
>> (a) leave RandomStringUtils deprecated in [lang] and pull in Amey’s
>> pull request moving it into [text].

+1

Gilles

>> (b) undeprecate it in [lang].
>>
>> The question is where should it reside? Does it fit as a general
>> java Lang extension or is it more focused on text?
>>
>> I’m in the middle here. Note also that we had some users ask why it
>> had been deprecated with no alternative.
>>
>> Amey - keep me honest here. I don’t want to overlook anything.
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>>> On Sep 28, 2017, at 5:13 PM, Gary Gregory <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Can someone summarize what our options are here please? I'd rather
>>> see it
>>> fresh than chasing links in mailing list archives and try to
>>> un-nest all
>>> the nesting... ;-)
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Rob Tompkins
>>> <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> As I'm pulling this in this crosses my mind:
>>>>
>>>> Wait I'm curious here. Weren't folks leaning towards keeping
>>>> RandomStringUtils in [lang]?
>>>>
>>>> The thread in question is this one: http://markmail.org/message/
>>>> 5tblwhldrwsbfdym
>>>>
>>>> It feels like @britter <https://github.com/britter>,
>>>> @PascalSchumacher
>>>> <https://github.com/pascalschumacher>, and @garydgregory
>>>> <https://github.com/garydgregory> were all leaning towards the
>>>> [lang]
>>>> option. If that's the case we should probably go with that.
>>>>
>>>> —
>>>> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
>>>> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
>>>>
>>>> <https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/62#issuecomment-332622968>,
>>>> or mute the thread
>>>>
>>>> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABIfN0WS8OJew2JaosTy8DEkFh8bqjU8ks5smpuVgaJpZM4PO83B>
>>>> .
>>>>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [lang][text] TEXT-101: RandomStringUtils

Benedikt Ritter-4
In reply to this post by Pascal Schumacher

> Am 29.09.2017 um 10:11 schrieb Pascal Schumacher <[hidden email]>:
>
> After thinking more about it, I came the conclusion that RandomStringUtils fits into [lang], so I'm for option (b).

+1

>
> Cheers,
> Pascal
>
> Am 28.09.2017 um 23:26 schrieb Rob Tompkins:
>> Options:
>>
>> (a) leave RandomStringUtils deprecated in [lang] and pull in Amey’s pull request moving it into [text].
>> (b) undeprecate it in [lang].
>>
>> The question is where should it reside? Does it fit as a general java Lang extension or is it more focused on text?
>>
>> I’m in the middle here. Note also that we had some users ask why it had been deprecated with no alternative.
>>
>> Amey - keep me honest here. I don’t want to overlook anything.
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>>> On Sep 28, 2017, at 5:13 PM, Gary Gregory <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Can someone summarize what our options are here please? I'd rather see it
>>> fresh than chasing links in mailing list archives and try to un-nest all
>>> the nesting... ;-)
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Rob Tompkins <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> As I'm pulling this in this crosses my mind:
>>>>
>>>> Wait I'm curious here. Weren't folks leaning towards keeping
>>>> RandomStringUtils in [lang]?
>>>>
>>>> The thread in question is this one: http://markmail.org/message/
>>>> 5tblwhldrwsbfdym
>>>>
>>>> It feels like @britter <https://github.com/britter>, @PascalSchumacher
>>>> <https://github.com/pascalschumacher>, and @garydgregory
>>>> <https://github.com/garydgregory> were all leaning towards the [lang]
>>>> option. If that's the case we should probably go with that.
>>>>
>>>> —
>>>> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
>>>> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
>>>> <https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/62#issuecomment-332622968>,
>>>> or mute the thread
>>>> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABIfN0WS8OJew2JaosTy8DEkFh8bqjU8ks5smpuVgaJpZM4PO83B>
>>>> .
>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [lang][text] TEXT-101: RandomStringUtils

Amey Jadiye
In reply to this post by Pascal Schumacher
Okey, no problem folks. I'm going to close my PR. also we might need to
release lang-3.6.1 for undoing deprecation of RandomStringUtils  if
lang-3.7 is far.

Regards,
Amey

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Pascal Schumacher <[hidden email]
> wrote:

> After thinking more about it, I came the conclusion that RandomStringUtils
> fits into [lang], so I'm for option (b).
>
> Cheers,
> Pascal
>
>
> Am 28.09.2017 um 23:26 schrieb Rob Tompkins:
>
>> Options:
>>
>> (a) leave RandomStringUtils deprecated in [lang] and pull in Amey’s pull
>> request moving it into [text].
>> (b) undeprecate it in [lang].
>>
>> The question is where should it reside? Does it fit as a general java
>> Lang extension or is it more focused on text?
>>
>> I’m in the middle here. Note also that we had some users ask why it had
>> been deprecated with no alternative.
>>
>> Amey - keep me honest here. I don’t want to overlook anything.
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>> On Sep 28, 2017, at 5:13 PM, Gary Gregory <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Can someone summarize what our options are here please? I'd rather see it
>>> fresh than chasing links in mailing list archives and try to un-nest all
>>> the nesting... ;-)
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Rob Tompkins <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> As I'm pulling this in this crosses my mind:
>>>>
>>>> Wait I'm curious here. Weren't folks leaning towards keeping
>>>> RandomStringUtils in [lang]?
>>>>
>>>> The thread in question is this one: http://markmail.org/message/
>>>> 5tblwhldrwsbfdym
>>>>
>>>> It feels like @britter <https://github.com/britter>, @PascalSchumacher
>>>> <https://github.com/pascalschumacher>, and @garydgregory
>>>> <https://github.com/garydgregory> were all leaning towards the [lang]
>>>> option. If that's the case we should probably go with that.
>>>>
>>>> —
>>>> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
>>>> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
>>>> <https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/62#issuecomment-332622968
>>>> >,
>>>> or mute the thread
>>>> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABIfN0WS8
>>>> OJew2JaosTy8DEkFh8bqjU8ks5smpuVgaJpZM4PO83B>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>


--

---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]

For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [lang][text] TEXT-101: RandomStringUtils

Pascal Schumacher
Sorry about wasting your work porting RandomStringUtils to commons-text. :(

Sorry,
Pascal

Am 29.09.2017 um 17:18 schrieb Amey Jadiye:

> Okey, no problem folks. I'm going to close my PR. also we might need to
> release lang-3.6.1 for undoing deprecation of RandomStringUtils  if
> lang-3.7 is far.
>
> Regards,
> Amey
>
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Pascal Schumacher <[hidden email]
>> wrote:
>> After thinking more about it, I came the conclusion that RandomStringUtils
>> fits into [lang], so I'm for option (b).
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Pascal
>>
>>
>> Am 28.09.2017 um 23:26 schrieb Rob Tompkins:
>>
>>> Options:
>>>
>>> (a) leave RandomStringUtils deprecated in [lang] and pull in Amey’s pull
>>> request moving it into [text].
>>> (b) undeprecate it in [lang].
>>>
>>> The question is where should it reside? Does it fit as a general java
>>> Lang extension or is it more focused on text?
>>>
>>> I’m in the middle here. Note also that we had some users ask why it had
>>> been deprecated with no alternative.
>>>
>>> Amey - keep me honest here. I don’t want to overlook anything.
>>>
>>> -Rob
>>>
>>> On Sep 28, 2017, at 5:13 PM, Gary Gregory <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> Can someone summarize what our options are here please? I'd rather see it
>>>> fresh than chasing links in mailing list archives and try to un-nest all
>>>> the nesting... ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Rob Tompkins <[hidden email]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> As I'm pulling this in this crosses my mind:
>>>>> Wait I'm curious here. Weren't folks leaning towards keeping
>>>>> RandomStringUtils in [lang]?
>>>>>
>>>>> The thread in question is this one: http://markmail.org/message/
>>>>> 5tblwhldrwsbfdym
>>>>>
>>>>> It feels like @britter <https://github.com/britter>, @PascalSchumacher
>>>>> <https://github.com/pascalschumacher>, and @garydgregory
>>>>> <https://github.com/garydgregory> were all leaning towards the [lang]
>>>>> option. If that's the case we should probably go with that.
>>>>>
>>>>> —
>>>>> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
>>>>> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/62#issuecomment-332622968
>>>>>> ,
>>>>> or mute the thread
>>>>> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABIfN0WS8
>>>>> OJew2JaosTy8DEkFh8bqjU8ks5smpuVgaJpZM4PO83B>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>
>>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [lang][text] TEXT-101: RandomStringUtils

Amey Jadiye
No worries Pascal, it was good experience to change core logic of
RandomStringUtils, also I'm free to pickup something else now ;-)

Regards,
Amey

On Mon, Oct 2, 2017, 3:49 PM Pascal Schumacher <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Sorry about wasting your work porting RandomStringUtils to commons-text. :(
>
> Sorry,
> Pascal
>
> Am 29.09.2017 um 17:18 schrieb Amey Jadiye:
> > Okey, no problem folks. I'm going to close my PR. also we might need to
> > release lang-3.6.1 for undoing deprecation of RandomStringUtils  if
> > lang-3.7 is far.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Amey
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Pascal Schumacher <
> [hidden email]
> >> wrote:
> >> After thinking more about it, I came the conclusion that
> RandomStringUtils
> >> fits into [lang], so I'm for option (b).
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Pascal
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 28.09.2017 um 23:26 schrieb Rob Tompkins:
> >>
> >>> Options:
> >>>
> >>> (a) leave RandomStringUtils deprecated in [lang] and pull in Amey’s
> pull
> >>> request moving it into [text].
> >>> (b) undeprecate it in [lang].
> >>>
> >>> The question is where should it reside? Does it fit as a general java
> >>> Lang extension or is it more focused on text?
> >>>
> >>> I’m in the middle here. Note also that we had some users ask why it had
> >>> been deprecated with no alternative.
> >>>
> >>> Amey - keep me honest here. I don’t want to overlook anything.
> >>>
> >>> -Rob
> >>>
> >>> On Sep 28, 2017, at 5:13 PM, Gary Gregory <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >>>> Can someone summarize what our options are here please? I'd rather
> see it
> >>>> fresh than chasing links in mailing list archives and try to un-nest
> all
> >>>> the nesting... ;-)
> >>>>
> >>>> Gary
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Rob Tompkins <
> [hidden email]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> As I'm pulling this in this crosses my mind:
> >>>>> Wait I'm curious here. Weren't folks leaning towards keeping
> >>>>> RandomStringUtils in [lang]?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The thread in question is this one: http://markmail.org/message/
> >>>>> 5tblwhldrwsbfdym
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It feels like @britter <https://github.com/britter>,
> @PascalSchumacher
> >>>>> <https://github.com/pascalschumacher>, and @garydgregory
> >>>>> <https://github.com/garydgregory> were all leaning towards the
> [lang]
> >>>>> option. If that's the case we should probably go with that.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> —
> >>>>> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> >>>>> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> >>>>> <
> https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/62#issuecomment-332622968
> >>>>>> ,
> >>>>> or mute the thread
> >>>>> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABIfN0WS8
> >>>>> OJew2JaosTy8DEkFh8bqjU8ks5smpuVgaJpZM4PO83B>
> >>>>> .
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >>>
> >>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>