[math] Distinguishing between 4.0 and later in jira

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[math] Distinguishing between 4.0 and later in jira

Rob Tompkins
Hello all,

I have attempted a sorting of the open/reopened issues in Jira. I’ve simply sorted them into 4.0 and 4.X (which I think gives us a solid amount of leeway here). Regardless of that, if someone wants to run through the list of 4.X issues:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-463?jql=project%20%3D%20MATH%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%204.X%20ORDER%20BY%20status%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-463?jql=project%20=%20MATH%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open,%20%22In%20Progress%22,%20Reopened)%20AND%20fixVersion%20=%204.X%20ORDER%20BY%20status%20DESC,%20priority%20DESC>

I would appreciate it. Further, if someone wants to look through the list of 4.0 issues to see if any can be postponed that would probably be good too. Next, I would think we would want to actively prioritize the 4.0 issues, and start chipping away at them.

Cheers,
-Rob
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [math] Distinguishing between 4.0 and later in jira

Gilles Sadowski
Hi Rob.

On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 10:26:39 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> I have attempted a sorting of the open/reopened issues in Jira. I’ve
> simply sorted them into 4.0 and 4.X (which I think gives us a solid
> amount of leeway here). Regardless of that, if someone wants to run
> through the list of 4.X issues:
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-463?jql=project%20%3D%20MATH%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%204.X%20ORDER%20BY%20status%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
>
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-463?jql=project%20=%20MATH%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open,%20%22In%20Progress%22,%20Reopened)%20AND%20fixVersion%20=%204.X%20ORDER%20BY%20status%20DESC,%20priority%20DESC>
>
> I would appreciate it. Further, if someone wants to look through the
> list of 4.0 issues to see if any can be postponed that would probably
> be good too. Next, I would think we would want to actively prioritize
> the 4.0 issues, and start chipping away at them.

I've changed some to 4.0, as by that time they should have been
fixed in "Commons Numbers" and resolved as "Won't do" in "Commons
Math".

Also, you could probably review the 4.X list, as some issues must
actually be assigned to a 5.X version, since they would require
an API change (and that cannot happen in any 4.X once 4.0 is
released).

Regards,
Gilles


>
> Cheers,
> -Rob


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]