[poll] Beta versions should be labeled "Beta", not "B".

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
9 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[poll] Beta versions should be labeled "Beta", not "B".

garydgregory
Hi All:

I would like to update https://commons.apache.org/releases/versioning.html to
read:

"Beta releases are denoted by adding "-beta<beta version number>" after the
release number. For example, if the current release version is 2.0.4, and a
developer wished to preview the next major release, the release would be
labeled 3.0-beta1"

Thoughts?
Gary
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [poll] Beta versions should be labeled "Beta", not "B".

Rob Tompkins
I’m a +1 on “beta" over “B"

It is indeed a good idea.

> On Mar 30, 2020, at 10:14 AM, Gary Gregory <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi All:
>
> I would like to update https://commons.apache.org/releases/versioning.html to
> read:
>
> "Beta releases are denoted by adding "-beta<beta version number>" after the
> release number. For example, if the current release version is 2.0.4, and a
> developer wished to preview the next major release, the release would be
> labeled 3.0-beta1"
>
> Thoughts?
> Gary


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [poll] Beta versions should be labeled "Beta", not "B".

Matt Juntunen
+1 for "beta".

-Matt
________________________________
From: Rob Tompkins <[hidden email]>
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 10:25 AM
To: Commons Developers List <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [poll] Beta versions should be labeled "Beta", not "B".

I’m a +1 on “beta" over “B"

It is indeed a good idea.

> On Mar 30, 2020, at 10:14 AM, Gary Gregory <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi All:
>
> I would like to update https://commons.apache.org/releases/versioning.html to
> read:
>
> "Beta releases are denoted by adding "-beta<beta version number>" after the
> release number. For example, if the current release version is 2.0.4, and a
> developer wished to preview the next major release, the release would be
> labeled 3.0-beta1"
>
> Thoughts?
> Gary


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [poll] Beta versions should be labeled "Beta", not "B".

Gilles Sadowski-2
Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 16:49, Matt Juntunen
<[hidden email]> a écrit :
>
> +1 for "beta".

+1

Gilles

>
> -Matt
> ________________________________
> From: Rob Tompkins <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 10:25 AM
> To: Commons Developers List <[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: [poll] Beta versions should be labeled "Beta", not "B".
>
> I’m a +1 on “beta" over “B"
>
> It is indeed a good idea.
>
> > On Mar 30, 2020, at 10:14 AM, Gary Gregory <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All:
> >
> > I would like to update https://commons.apache.org/releases/versioning.html to
> > read:
> >
> > "Beta releases are denoted by adding "-beta<beta version number>" after the
> > release number. For example, if the current release version is 2.0.4, and a
> > developer wished to preview the next major release, the release would be
> > labeled 3.0-beta1"
> >
> > Thoughts?
> > Gary

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [poll] Beta versions should be labeled "Beta", not "B".

Xeno Amess
I prefer 3.0-rc1
but 3.0-beta1 sounds far better than 3.0-B1

XenoAmess

________________________________
From: Gilles Sadowski <[hidden email]>
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 11:37:43 PM
To: Commons Developers List <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [poll] Beta versions should be labeled "Beta", not "B".

Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 16:49, Matt Juntunen
<[hidden email]> a écrit :
>
> +1 for "beta".

+1

Gilles

>
> -Matt
> ________________________________
> From: Rob Tompkins <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 10:25 AM
> To: Commons Developers List <[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: [poll] Beta versions should be labeled "Beta", not "B".
>
> I’m a +1 on “beta" over “B"
>
> It is indeed a good idea.
>
> > On Mar 30, 2020, at 10:14 AM, Gary Gregory <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All:
> >
> > I would like to update https://commons.apache.org/releases/versioning.html to
> > read:
> >
> > "Beta releases are denoted by adding "-beta<beta version number>" after the
> > release number. For example, if the current release version is 2.0.4, and a
> > developer wished to preview the next major release, the release would be
> > labeled 3.0-beta1"
> >
> > Thoughts?
> > Gary

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [poll] Beta versions should be labeled "Beta", not "B".

sebb-2-2
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 17:05, Xeno Amess <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> I prefer 3.0-rc1

rc1 is release candidate 1; the suffix is dropped for the actual
release artifacts.

e.g. we vote on 3.0-beta1-rc1 but the release is called 3.0-beta1

> but 3.0-beta1 sounds far better than 3.0-B1

+1

> XenoAmess
>
> ________________________________
> From: Gilles Sadowski <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 11:37:43 PM
> To: Commons Developers List <[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: [poll] Beta versions should be labeled "Beta", not "B".
>
> Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 16:49, Matt Juntunen
> <[hidden email]> a écrit :
> >
> > +1 for "beta".
>
> +1
>
> Gilles
>
> >
> > -Matt
> > ________________________________
> > From: Rob Tompkins <[hidden email]>
> > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 10:25 AM
> > To: Commons Developers List <[hidden email]>
> > Subject: Re: [poll] Beta versions should be labeled "Beta", not "B".
> >
> > I’m a +1 on “beta" over “B"
> >
> > It is indeed a good idea.
> >
> > > On Mar 30, 2020, at 10:14 AM, Gary Gregory <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi All:
> > >
> > > I would like to update https://commons.apache.org/releases/versioning.html to
> > > read:
> > >
> > > "Beta releases are denoted by adding "-beta<beta version number>" after the
> > > release number. For example, if the current release version is 2.0.4, and a
> > > developer wished to preview the next major release, the release would be
> > > labeled 3.0-beta1"
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > > Gary
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [poll] Beta versions should be labeled "Beta", not "B".

garydgregory
In reply to this post by Xeno Amess
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 12:05 PM Xeno Amess <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I prefer 3.0-rc1
>

This is too confusing since we already use the RC naming for release
candidate in VOTEs.

Gary


> but 3.0-beta1 sounds far better than 3.0-B1
>
> XenoAmess
>
> ________________________________
> From: Gilles Sadowski <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 11:37:43 PM
> To: Commons Developers List <[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: [poll] Beta versions should be labeled "Beta", not "B".
>
> Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 16:49, Matt Juntunen
> <[hidden email]> a écrit :
> >
> > +1 for "beta".
>
> +1
>
> Gilles
>
> >
> > -Matt
> > ________________________________
> > From: Rob Tompkins <[hidden email]>
> > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 10:25 AM
> > To: Commons Developers List <[hidden email]>
> > Subject: Re: [poll] Beta versions should be labeled "Beta", not "B".
> >
> > I’m a +1 on “beta" over “B"
> >
> > It is indeed a good idea.
> >
> > > On Mar 30, 2020, at 10:14 AM, Gary Gregory <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi All:
> > >
> > > I would like to update
> https://commons.apache.org/releases/versioning.html to
> > > read:
> > >
> > > "Beta releases are denoted by adding "-beta<beta version number>"
> after the
> > > release number. For example, if the current release version is 2.0.4,
> and a
> > > developer wished to preview the next major release, the release would
> be
> > > labeled 3.0-beta1"
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > > Gary
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [poll] Beta versions should be labeled "Beta", not "B".

Bruno P. Kinoshita-2
In reply to this post by garydgregory
 +1 to -beta1
Bruno

    On Tuesday, 31 March 2020, 3:14:37 am NZDT, Gary Gregory <[hidden email]> wrote:  
 
 Hi All:

I would like to update https://commons.apache.org/releases/versioning.html to
read:

"Beta releases are denoted by adding "-beta<beta version number>" after the
release number. For example, if the current release version is 2.0.4, and a
developer wished to preview the next major release, the release would be
labeled 3.0-beta1"

Thoughts?
Gary
 
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [poll] Beta versions should be labeled "Beta", not "B".

garydgregory
I updated the site.

Thank you all for your replies.

Gary


On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 7:24 PM Bruno P. Kinoshita <[hidden email]> wrote:

>  +1 to -beta1
> Bruno
>
>     On Tuesday, 31 March 2020, 3:14:37 am NZDT, Gary Gregory <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
>  Hi All:
>
> I would like to update https://commons.apache.org/releases/versioning.html
> to
> read:
>
> "Beta releases are denoted by adding "-beta<beta version number>" after the
> release number. For example, if the current release version is 2.0.4, and a
> developer wished to preview the next major release, the release would be
> labeled 3.0-beta1"
>
> Thoughts?
> Gary
>